• United States v. Microsoft: Deposition by Bill Gates, part 1.

    United States v. Microsoft was a court case filed against Microsoft by the United States Department of Justice. The plaintiffs alleged that Microsoft abused monopoly power in its handling of operating system sales and web browser sales. The issue central to the case was whether Microsoft was allowed to bundle its flagship Internet Explorer (IE) web browser software with its Windows operating system. Microsoft stated that the merging of Windows and Internet Explorer was the result of innovation and competition, and that the two were now the same product and were inextricably linked together and that consumers were now getting all the benefits of IE for free.

    published: 03 May 2012
  • Structure of the Court System: Crash Course Government and Politics #19

    This week Craig Benzine is going to talk about the structure of the U.S. court system and how exactly it manages to keep things moving smoothly. We’’ll talk about trial courts, district courts, appeals courts, circuit courts, state supreme courts, and of course the one at the top - the U.S. Supreme Court. It’s all quite a bit to manage with jurisdictions and such, but it's important to remember that the vast majority of cases never even make it to court! Most are settled out of court, but also terms like mootness and ripeness are used to throw cases out altogether. Today, we're going to focus on how cases make it to the top, and next week we’ll talk about what happens when they get there. Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios Support is...

    published: 05 Jun 2015
  • Frank Easterbrook, "The Supreme Court of the United States and Business Litigation"

    published: 20 Feb 2015
  • Andy Ostrowski: American System of Justice Litigation -- Overview

    published: 02 Sep 2017
  • United States v.s Holy Land Foundation Litigation #JihadInAmerica

    The Holy Land Foundation was the largest Islamic charity in the United States. Headquartered in Richardson, Texas, it was originally known as Occupied Land Fund. In December 2001, the U.S. government designated HLF a terrorist organization, seized its assets, and closed the organization. In 2004, a federal grand jury in Dallas, Texas charged HLF and five former officers and employees with providing material support to Hamas and related offenses. The prosecution's theory was that HLF distributed charity through local zakat (charity) committees located in the West Bank; that Hamas controlled those zakat committees; and that by distributing charity through Hamas-controlled committees, HLF helped Hamas win the "hearts and minds" of the Palestinian people. The first trial, in 2007, ended in th...

    published: 23 Jun 2016
  • Litigation And Legal Practice - The American Legal System (Episode 1)

    Law School for Everyone - Litigation And Legal Practice Litigation And The American Legal System

    published: 26 Nov 2017
  • United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

    United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

    published: 17 Aug 2015
  • Jeffrey L. Fisher | Supreme Court Litigation

    Professor Jeffrey L. Fisher - one of the most experienced and successful appellate advocates in the country - discusses his practice before the United States Supreme Court. Fisher leads Stanford's Supreme Court clinic. In an interview with Professor Lisa Kern Griffin, he addresses the cert. process and the Supreme Court's case selection, the role of oral argument, and some of his recent cases concerning marriage equality, digital privacy, and other criminal procedure issues. Sponsored by the Program in Public Law.

    published: 09 Feb 2016
  • United States of Monsanto: GMO giant is now litigation proof

    After President Obama signed the Agriculture Appropriations Bill into law on Tuesday, hundreds of thousands of people have voiced their opposition to H.R. 933. A provision in the law known as the "Monsanto Protection Act" protects the biotech industry from being sued in a court of law. The Farmer Assurance provision takes the Federal Court's right to halt the sale and use of genetically modified seed crops regardless of health risks. Jeffrey M. Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, joins us to discuss. Find RT America in your area: http://rt.com/where-to-watch/ Or watch us online: http://rt.com/on-air/rt-america-air/ Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTAmerica Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_America

    published: 29 Mar 2013
  • Litigation Attorney, What Constitutes Someone Being Called A United States Natural Born Citizen

    See also https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/category/natural-born-citizen/ I use the ff. to guide Founding Fathers Intent: "To be a United States Natural Born Citizen, he (or she) must be one of sole nationality, so that were he (or she) ever stripped of citizenship in the United States, he (or she) would be declared as “Stateless. " "...the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.” The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845), p. 414 In 1833, in U.S. Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story's Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. § 1473 “ It is indispensible too, that the president should be a natural born citizen of the United States... to exclude foreign influence from their executive coun...

    published: 12 Feb 2016
  • Lecture 4: Patent Law & Litigation

    At the end of this video, you will be able to: - Describe the differences between U.S. and European patent laws. - Describe the history of patent litigation in the United States. -------------------------------- Take the full course on Udemy.com: http://buff.ly/2mJVjNS Michelson20mm.org Michelsonip.com *Intellectual Property: Inventors, Entrepreneurs, Creators* A FREE Intellectual Property online course by The Michelson 20MM Foundation & IPO Education Foundation. Take the course on Udemy to develop a working knowledge of the basics of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. Brought to you by The Michelson 20MM Foundation & IPO Education Foundation, made possible by the generous support of Alya and Gary Michelson, M.D. -------------------------------- If you have question...

    published: 01 Mar 2017
  • What is Discovery: Discovery & Settlement

    What is Discovery: Discovery & Settlement. This video discusses the relationship between discovery and settlement in the United States. uslawessentials.com/blog uslawessentials.com

    published: 06 May 2014
  • Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 1 | Intellectual property | United States

    S P E A K E R S Jeffrey Margulies, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Michelle Pardo, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Saul Perloff, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Stephanie Stroup, Senior Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright Companies that make, market and sell consumer products are increasingly vulnerable to consumer fraud litigation. Class actions alleging deceptive advertising and unfair trade practices have become a veritable "growth industry" for enterprising plaintiff's lawyers. These cases often flow directly from government investigations and enforcement actions or private business litigation. For consumer product companies, understanding the current trends influencing consumer fraud litigation is crucial to managing this risk. Our two part webinar will discuss the key considerations and t...

    published: 07 Oct 2016
  • What is an appeal in a civil litigation?

    What is an appeal in a civil litigation? This video introduces appellate practice, where a party that did not prevail on one or more claims in a civil litigation argues that the trial court judge committed an error. To discuss further, feel free to send me an email and to comment below. Also, please visit my new website and blog. I offer online tutoring and consultations. website: http://www.uslawessentials.squarespace.com blog: http://www.uslawessentials.squarespace.com/blog email:uslawessentials at gmail dot com Twitter:https://twitter.com/uslawessentials United States Law: An Introduction for International Students is available at: https://www.amazon.com/author/danieledelson

    published: 16 Aug 2014
  • What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean?

    What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean? INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION meaning - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION definition - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. SUBSCRIBE to our Google Earth flights channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6UuCPh7GrXznZi0Hz2YQnQ International litigation, sometimes called transnational litigation, is the practice of litigation in connection with disputes among businesses or individuals residing or based in different countries. The main difference between international litigation and domestic litigation is that, in the former, certain issues are more likely to be of significance — such as personal jurisdiction, service of proc...

    published: 21 Aug 2017
  • The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States

    John Beisner, a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, discusses the paper "Selling Lawsuits, Buying Trouble: The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States," which was released at the 10th Annual Legal Reform Summit on October 28, 2009. This paper begins with an overview of third-party litigation financing. It next examines current third-party financing practices in the United States. It then sets forth a critique of the practice, particularly the incentives it creates to engage in frivolous and abusive litigation. In this section, the paper also presents a case study on the Commonwealth of Australia, the first jurisdiction to permit third-party litigation funding, where such funding has dramatically increased litigation and given investors pe...

    published: 11 Apr 2011
  • Overview of a federal court lawsuit

    We wanted to share with you a 33 minute video that we give to clients to give them a good overview of what happens after they file their federal court lawsuit against a debt collector, credit reporting company, or other company. We have broken down the process into 8 steps that we hope will be helpful to you. Thanks for watching this and we welcome your comments below and if you find this to be helpful be sure and share it. John Watts Birmingham, Alabama www.AlabamaConsumer.com 205-879-2447 "No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers."

    published: 20 Dec 2013
  • Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 2 | Intellectual property | United States

    S P E A K E R S Jeffrey Margulies, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Michelle Pardo, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Saul Perloff, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Stephanie Stroup, Senior Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright Companies that make, market and sell consumer products are increasingly vulnerable to consumer fraud litigation. Class actions alleging deceptive advertising and unfair trade practices have become a veritable "growth industry" for enterprising plaintiff's lawyers. These cases often flow directly from government investigations and enforcement actions or private business litigation. For consumer product companies, understanding the current trends influencing consumer fraud litigation is crucial to managing this risk. Our two part webinar will discuss the key considerations and t...

    published: 02 Nov 2016
  • US District Court of RI Litigation Academy HD

    The “Litigation Academy” is a program of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island in partnership with Roger Williams University Law School and the Rhode Island Chapter of the Federal Bar Association that was created to provide a low-cost, high-quality forum for teaching practitioners of all experience levels the skills needed to successfully litigate cases. You are welcome to watch a short video of the program that was created by Carlos Andres Toro of Steer Digital Media.

    published: 02 Sep 2016
  • Session 5: Domestic Litigation of International Norms (June 12, 2013)

    International human rights norms can be, and have been, invoked in domestic litigation in a wide variety of contexts. State and federal courts in the United States have considered human rights claims - including those brought under the Alien Tort Statute - and the United States' international legal obligations on a range of issues. Panelists illustrated the ways in which international norms can be used to advance accountability for human rights abuses and strengthen arguments for protection or redress, but also identified the challenges and limitations of these strategies. Chimène Keitner, UC Hastings College of the Law Kathy Roberts, Center for Justice & Accountability Naomi Roht-Arriaza, UC Hastings College of the Law Karen Musalo, Center for Gender & Refugee Studies View or download t...

    published: 19 Jun 2013
  • Federal Court Litigation

    http://www.leighlawgroup.com - federal court litigation,federal court attorney,federal court lawyer

    published: 27 Jan 2012
  • Global litigation school: Employment and labor risks in 2016 | Employment and labor | United States

    Speakers: Shafeeqa Giarratani, Norton Rose Fulbright Andrew Price, Norton Rose Fulbright Blog: http://www.globalworkplaceinsider.com/ Presentation: http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/fi... This web seminar covers the United States (US) and European Union (EU) employment and labor risks that are trending and how they may impact insureds and claims in this area. Topics will include: • Wage and hour class and collective actions – the cause and effect of the uptick in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and wage and hour class and collective actions, with a high concentration in the energy sector. • Sexual orientation – the rise in sexual orientation claims after the major Supreme Court Obergefell decision in 2015. • Whistleblowing – the potential impact of whistleblower claims. • Alternat...

    published: 01 Mar 2016
  • Federal Tax Litigation, Choosing the Best Court to Make Your Appeal

    As the principal attorney for the Law Offices of Christina Weed, PC, I have previously discussed how to initiate a tax court case in U.S. Tax Court if you have not received a desirable result during the course of your audit or with IRS Appeals. But, did you know that not all tax cases need to be brought in a U.S. Tax Court? Alternative options include filing a claim for refund in U.S. District Court and otherwise a case for refund could be brought in the U.S. Court of Federal claims. Each option has it's own distinctions and requirements, and it is important to meet with a tax lawyer who can advise you on which court may be best for your situation. Learn more here: https://cwlawoffices.com/federal-tax-litigation/

    published: 15 Sep 2017
  • Trademark Litigation Attorney 50 States-Vid58

    Experienced trademark and unfair competition and intellectual property attorney in New York City (Carl Person) can assist lawyers anywhere in the United States in representing plaintiffs or defendants in Lanham Act or common law trademark litigation. Lanham Act infringement cases involve statutory damages which can be assessed against an infringing defendant, even though the trademark owner cannot show even one cent in damages by reason of the infringement, causing a substantial increase in trademark litigation to go after the million dollar bounty. Mr. Person provides high quality legal services at an affordable hourly rate, which can be an extension of another lawyer's office.

    published: 25 May 2011
  • United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

    United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

    published: 17 Aug 2015
  • Attorneys in the United States The Forum Litigation Attorney US Department of Justice on 1MDB

    published: 25 Feb 2017
  • Transnational Litigation in United States Courts Concepts and Insights

    published: 08 Apr 2017
  • Frank Easterbrook, "The Supreme Court of the United States and Business Litigation"

    published: 20 Feb 2015
  • International Civil Litigation in United States Courts by Gary B. Born

    International Civil Litigation in United States Courts by Gary B. Born More Info : http://j.mp/2lFZhny

    published: 13 Feb 2017
developed with YouTube
United States v. Microsoft: Deposition by Bill Gates, part 1.

United States v. Microsoft: Deposition by Bill Gates, part 1.

  • Order:
  • Duration: 53:18
  • Updated: 03 May 2012
  • views: 128195
videos
United States v. Microsoft was a court case filed against Microsoft by the United States Department of Justice. The plaintiffs alleged that Microsoft abused monopoly power in its handling of operating system sales and web browser sales. The issue central to the case was whether Microsoft was allowed to bundle its flagship Internet Explorer (IE) web browser software with its Windows operating system. Microsoft stated that the merging of Windows and Internet Explorer was the result of innovation and competition, and that the two were now the same product and were inextricably linked together and that consumers were now getting all the benefits of IE for free.
https://wn.com/United_States_V._Microsoft_Deposition_By_Bill_Gates,_Part_1.
Structure of the Court System: Crash Course Government and Politics #19

Structure of the Court System: Crash Course Government and Politics #19

  • Order:
  • Duration: 6:59
  • Updated: 05 Jun 2015
  • views: 444789
videos
This week Craig Benzine is going to talk about the structure of the U.S. court system and how exactly it manages to keep things moving smoothly. We’’ll talk about trial courts, district courts, appeals courts, circuit courts, state supreme courts, and of course the one at the top - the U.S. Supreme Court. It’s all quite a bit to manage with jurisdictions and such, but it's important to remember that the vast majority of cases never even make it to court! Most are settled out of court, but also terms like mootness and ripeness are used to throw cases out altogether. Today, we're going to focus on how cases make it to the top, and next week we’ll talk about what happens when they get there. Produced in collaboration with PBS Digital Studios: http://youtube.com/pbsdigitalstudios Support is provided by Voqal: http://www.voqal.org All Flickr.com images are licensed under Creative Commons by Attribution 2.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/legalcode Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/YouTubeCrashCourse Twitter - http://www.twitter.com/TheCrashCourse Tumblr - http://thecrashcourse.tumblr.com Support Crash Course on Patreon: http://patreon.com/crashcourse CC Kids: http://www.youtube.com/crashcoursekids
https://wn.com/Structure_Of_The_Court_System_Crash_Course_Government_And_Politics_19
Frank Easterbrook, "The Supreme Court of the United States and Business Litigation"

Frank Easterbrook, "The Supreme Court of the United States and Business Litigation"

  • Order:
  • Duration: 45:57
  • Updated: 20 Feb 2015
  • views: 667
videos
https://wn.com/Frank_Easterbrook,_The_Supreme_Court_Of_The_United_States_And_Business_Litigation
Andy Ostrowski: American System of Justice Litigation -- Overview

Andy Ostrowski: American System of Justice Litigation -- Overview

  • Order:
  • Duration: 26:51
  • Updated: 02 Sep 2017
  • views: 1412
videos
https://wn.com/Andy_Ostrowski_American_System_Of_Justice_Litigation_Overview
United States v.s  Holy Land Foundation Litigation #JihadInAmerica

United States v.s Holy Land Foundation Litigation #JihadInAmerica

  • Order:
  • Duration: 6:06
  • Updated: 23 Jun 2016
  • views: 228
videos
The Holy Land Foundation was the largest Islamic charity in the United States. Headquartered in Richardson, Texas, it was originally known as Occupied Land Fund. In December 2001, the U.S. government designated HLF a terrorist organization, seized its assets, and closed the organization. In 2004, a federal grand jury in Dallas, Texas charged HLF and five former officers and employees with providing material support to Hamas and related offenses. The prosecution's theory was that HLF distributed charity through local zakat (charity) committees located in the West Bank; that Hamas controlled those zakat committees; and that by distributing charity through Hamas-controlled committees, HLF helped Hamas win the "hearts and minds" of the Palestinian people. The first trial, in 2007, ended in the partial acquittal of one defendant and a hung jury on all other charges. At a retrial in 2008, the jury found all defendants guilty on all counts. The 2008 trial of the charity leaders was the "largest terrorism financing prosecution in American history." In 2009, the founders of the organization were given sentences of between 15 and 65 years in prison for "funneling $12 million to Hamas." The organization's website stated: "Our mission is to find and implement practical solutions for human suffering through humanitarian programs that impact the lives of the disadvantaged, disinherited, and displaced peoples suffering from man-made and natural disasters." HLF, originally known as the Occupied Land Fund, was established in California in 1989 as a tax-exempt charity. In 1992, HLF relocated to Richardson, Texas. It had offices in California, New Jersey, and Illinois, and individual representatives scattered throughout the US, the West Bank, and Gaza. Among the founders of the Holy Land Foundation is Mousa Mohammed Abu Marzook, a political leader of Hamas, who provided substantial funds to the Holy Land Foundation in the early 1990s, before Hamas was designated a terrorist organization. HLF reported Marzook's donations on its tax returns. Marzook was deported from the US to Jordan in 1997. He was indicted on August 20, 2004, by a US federal grand jury in Chicago, Illinois. He and two other individuals were charged with a 15-year conspiracy to raise funds for terrorist attacks against Israel. Neither HLF nor any HLF officer was charged in the Chicago indictment. In the year 2000, HLF raised over $13 million. According to the United States Department of Treasury, HLF supported Hamas activities through direct fund transfers to its offices in the West Bank and Gaza that are affiliated with Hamas, and transfers of funds to Islamic charity committees ("zakat committees") and other charitable organizations that are part of Hamas or controlled by Hamas members. The Department of Treasury also reported that HLF funds were used by Hamas to support schools that served Hamas's ends by encouraging children to become suicide bombers and to recruit suicide bombers by offering support to their families. Edward Abington, Jr., former U.S. consul general in Jerusalem, acted as a defense witness and testified that during his daily CIA briefings he had never been informed that Hamas controlled the Palestinian charity groups mentioned. The Treasury Department designated HLF as a terrorist organization on December 4, 2001 under President Bush's Executive Order 13224 (Bush). The United States Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Asset Control designated HLF as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist, while the European Union froze its European Assets. -~-~~-~~~-~~-~- Please watch: "EXPOSING: Roman Curia (Catholic Church) And Global Pedophila Networks" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxGgRSRDuRM -~-~~-~~~-~~-~-
https://wn.com/United_States_V.S_Holy_Land_Foundation_Litigation_Jihadinamerica
Litigation And Legal Practice - The American Legal System (Episode 1)

Litigation And Legal Practice - The American Legal System (Episode 1)

  • Order:
  • Duration: 31:46
  • Updated: 26 Nov 2017
  • views: 0
videos
Law School for Everyone - Litigation And Legal Practice Litigation And The American Legal System
https://wn.com/Litigation_And_Legal_Practice_The_American_Legal_System_(Episode_1)
United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

  • Order:
  • Duration: 10:55
  • Updated: 17 Aug 2015
  • views: 29
videos https://wn.com/United_States_Body_Shop_Litigation_(Cnn_Report)
Jeffrey L. Fisher | Supreme Court Litigation

Jeffrey L. Fisher | Supreme Court Litigation

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:13:17
  • Updated: 09 Feb 2016
  • views: 1118
videos
Professor Jeffrey L. Fisher - one of the most experienced and successful appellate advocates in the country - discusses his practice before the United States Supreme Court. Fisher leads Stanford's Supreme Court clinic. In an interview with Professor Lisa Kern Griffin, he addresses the cert. process and the Supreme Court's case selection, the role of oral argument, and some of his recent cases concerning marriage equality, digital privacy, and other criminal procedure issues. Sponsored by the Program in Public Law.
https://wn.com/Jeffrey_L._Fisher_|_Supreme_Court_Litigation
United States of Monsanto: GMO giant is now litigation proof

United States of Monsanto: GMO giant is now litigation proof

  • Order:
  • Duration: 7:25
  • Updated: 29 Mar 2013
  • views: 20426
videos
After President Obama signed the Agriculture Appropriations Bill into law on Tuesday, hundreds of thousands of people have voiced their opposition to H.R. 933. A provision in the law known as the "Monsanto Protection Act" protects the biotech industry from being sued in a court of law. The Farmer Assurance provision takes the Federal Court's right to halt the sale and use of genetically modified seed crops regardless of health risks. Jeffrey M. Smith, author of Seeds of Deception, joins us to discuss. Find RT America in your area: http://rt.com/where-to-watch/ Or watch us online: http://rt.com/on-air/rt-america-air/ Like us on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/RTAmerica Follow us on Twitter http://twitter.com/RT_America
https://wn.com/United_States_Of_Monsanto_Gmo_Giant_Is_Now_Litigation_Proof
Litigation Attorney, What Constitutes Someone Being Called A United States Natural Born Citizen

Litigation Attorney, What Constitutes Someone Being Called A United States Natural Born Citizen

  • Order:
  • Duration: 12:09
  • Updated: 12 Feb 2016
  • views: 60730
videos
See also https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/category/natural-born-citizen/ I use the ff. to guide Founding Fathers Intent: "To be a United States Natural Born Citizen, he (or she) must be one of sole nationality, so that were he (or she) ever stripped of citizenship in the United States, he (or she) would be declared as “Stateless. " "...the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.” The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845), p. 414 In 1833, in U.S. Supreme Court Justice Joseph Story's Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. § 1473 “ It is indispensible too, that the president should be a natural born citizen of the United States... to exclude foreign influence from their executive councils and duties." Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803) @174 It cannot be presumed that any clause in the Constitution is intended to be without effect....
https://wn.com/Litigation_Attorney,_What_Constitutes_Someone_Being_Called_A_United_States_Natural_Born_Citizen
Lecture 4: Patent Law & Litigation

Lecture 4: Patent Law & Litigation

  • Order:
  • Duration: 6:32
  • Updated: 01 Mar 2017
  • views: 256
videos
At the end of this video, you will be able to: - Describe the differences between U.S. and European patent laws. - Describe the history of patent litigation in the United States. -------------------------------- Take the full course on Udemy.com: http://buff.ly/2mJVjNS Michelson20mm.org Michelsonip.com *Intellectual Property: Inventors, Entrepreneurs, Creators* A FREE Intellectual Property online course by The Michelson 20MM Foundation & IPO Education Foundation. Take the course on Udemy to develop a working knowledge of the basics of patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets. Brought to you by The Michelson 20MM Foundation & IPO Education Foundation, made possible by the generous support of Alya and Gary Michelson, M.D. -------------------------------- If you have questions or comments please email us at info@20mm.org
https://wn.com/Lecture_4_Patent_Law_Litigation
What is Discovery: Discovery & Settlement

What is Discovery: Discovery & Settlement

  • Order:
  • Duration: 4:17
  • Updated: 06 May 2014
  • views: 10879
videos
What is Discovery: Discovery & Settlement. This video discusses the relationship between discovery and settlement in the United States. uslawessentials.com/blog uslawessentials.com
https://wn.com/What_Is_Discovery_Discovery_Settlement
Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 1 | Intellectual property | United States

Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 1 | Intellectual property | United States

  • Order:
  • Duration: 57:38
  • Updated: 07 Oct 2016
  • views: 75
videos
S P E A K E R S Jeffrey Margulies, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Michelle Pardo, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Saul Perloff, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Stephanie Stroup, Senior Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright Companies that make, market and sell consumer products are increasingly vulnerable to consumer fraud litigation. Class actions alleging deceptive advertising and unfair trade practices have become a veritable "growth industry" for enterprising plaintiff's lawyers. These cases often flow directly from government investigations and enforcement actions or private business litigation. For consumer product companies, understanding the current trends influencing consumer fraud litigation is crucial to managing this risk. Our two part webinar will discuss the key considerations and trends impacting consumer fraud litigation today, including government and Lanham Act litigation, recent legal decisions, as well as class action litigation and trial strategies. Topics included: - Government litigation priorities and Lanham litigation and recent trends in consumer class actions S E L F - S T U D Y If you are viewing a recording of this web seminar, most state bar organizations will only allow you to claim self-study CLE credit. Please refer to your state's CLE rules. If you have any questions regarding CLE approval of this course in your applicable bar, please contact your bar administrator.
https://wn.com/Advertising_And_Consumer_Fraud_Litigation_Part_1_|_Intellectual_Property_|_United_States
What is an appeal in a civil litigation?

What is an appeal in a civil litigation?

  • Order:
  • Duration: 2:15
  • Updated: 16 Aug 2014
  • views: 4503
videos
What is an appeal in a civil litigation? This video introduces appellate practice, where a party that did not prevail on one or more claims in a civil litigation argues that the trial court judge committed an error. To discuss further, feel free to send me an email and to comment below. Also, please visit my new website and blog. I offer online tutoring and consultations. website: http://www.uslawessentials.squarespace.com blog: http://www.uslawessentials.squarespace.com/blog email:uslawessentials at gmail dot com Twitter:https://twitter.com/uslawessentials United States Law: An Introduction for International Students is available at: https://www.amazon.com/author/danieledelson
https://wn.com/What_Is_An_Appeal_In_A_Civil_Litigation
What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean?

What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean?

  • Order:
  • Duration: 7:40
  • Updated: 21 Aug 2017
  • views: 40
videos
What is INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION? What does INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION mean? INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION meaning - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION definition - INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION explanation. Source: Wikipedia.org article, adapted under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ license. SUBSCRIBE to our Google Earth flights channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC6UuCPh7GrXznZi0Hz2YQnQ International litigation, sometimes called transnational litigation, is the practice of litigation in connection with disputes among businesses or individuals residing or based in different countries. The main difference between international litigation and domestic litigation is that, in the former, certain issues are more likely to be of significance — such as personal jurisdiction, service of process, evidence from abroad, and enforcement of judgments. Although there are differences among the jurisdictional statutes of many American states, they all are subject to the due process requirements imposed by the Constitution of the United States. As a result, most American lawyers who are familiar with general principles of jurisdiction in one or more states of the US are able to guide their clients through jurisdictional issues in connection with disputes among litigants from different states. The situation is different with respect to jurisdictional principles in the international context. The first difference concerns long-arm jurisdiction, which is the statutory grant of jurisdiction to local courts over out-of-state defendants. A long-arm statute authorizes a court in a state to exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant. Without a long-arm statute, the courts in a state might not have personal jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant. A state's authorization to exercise jurisdiction is limited by the federal Constitution. The use of a long-arm statute is usually considered constitutional where the defendant has certain minimum contacts with the forum state and there has been reasonable notice of the action against that defendant. Second, many countries take the view that American concepts of long-arm jurisdiction are too broad, and courts of such countries will not recognize judgments from American courts based on the exercise of American long-arm jurisdiction. Looking at the issue from the non-American perspective, courts in some countries exercise jurisdiction based upon principles that American courts would consider unfair and repugnant to American law. For example, in some countries, such as England and Israel, a court may exercise jurisdiction over a defendant that is considered to be a "necessary or proper" party in a case against a local defendant. It is not clear that such a jurisdictional basis would be upheld by American courts when the non-US judgment-creditor seeks to enforce in the United States. In every lawsuit, the plaintiff must effect service of process upon the defendant(s). In the international context, the issue of service of process is more complex. In the United States, service of process is routinely carried out by private lawyers or their agents. In contrast, many other countries consider the activity of serving process in a judicial proceeding to be one appropriate only for the government or an arm of the government. As a result of differing approaches to the issue of service of process, several nations signed the Hague Service Convention (1965), under which each member nation is required to establish a Central Authority to receive, review, and execute requests from foreign courts for carrying out service of process. Most countries that are signatories to the Hague Service Convention will accept requests for service that are signed by the lawyer for the plaintiff (claimant). Two exceptions are the UK and Israel. .....
https://wn.com/What_Is_International_Litigation_What_Does_International_Litigation_Mean
The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States

The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States

  • Order:
  • Duration: 2:06
  • Updated: 11 Apr 2011
  • views: 753
videos
John Beisner, a partner at Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, discusses the paper "Selling Lawsuits, Buying Trouble: The Emerging World of Third-Party Litigation Financing in the United States," which was released at the 10th Annual Legal Reform Summit on October 28, 2009. This paper begins with an overview of third-party litigation financing. It next examines current third-party financing practices in the United States. It then sets forth a critique of the practice, particularly the incentives it creates to engage in frivolous and abusive litigation. In this section, the paper also presents a case study on the Commonwealth of Australia, the first jurisdiction to permit third-party litigation funding, where such funding has dramatically increased litigation and given investors pervasive — even total — control over a plaintiff's litigation. Finally, the paper proposes that third-party litigation financing be prohibited in the United States to prevent these abuses. At the very least, the paper concludes, such funding should be banned in class actions and other forms of aggregate litigation. The paper can be found online here: http://www.instituteforlegalreform.com/selling-lawsuits-buying-trouble-the-emerging-world-of-third-party-litigation-financing-in-the-united-states.html
https://wn.com/The_Emerging_World_Of_Third_Party_Litigation_Financing_In_The_United_States
Overview of a federal court lawsuit

Overview of a federal court lawsuit

  • Order:
  • Duration: 33:47
  • Updated: 20 Dec 2013
  • views: 4268
videos
We wanted to share with you a 33 minute video that we give to clients to give them a good overview of what happens after they file their federal court lawsuit against a debt collector, credit reporting company, or other company. We have broken down the process into 8 steps that we hope will be helpful to you. Thanks for watching this and we welcome your comments below and if you find this to be helpful be sure and share it. John Watts Birmingham, Alabama www.AlabamaConsumer.com 205-879-2447 "No representation is made that the quality of legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers."
https://wn.com/Overview_Of_A_Federal_Court_Lawsuit
Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 2 | Intellectual property | United States

Advertising and consumer fraud litigation: Part 2 | Intellectual property | United States

  • Order:
  • Duration: 58:42
  • Updated: 02 Nov 2016
  • views: 82
videos
S P E A K E R S Jeffrey Margulies, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Michelle Pardo, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Saul Perloff, Partner, Norton Rose Fulbright Stephanie Stroup, Senior Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright Companies that make, market and sell consumer products are increasingly vulnerable to consumer fraud litigation. Class actions alleging deceptive advertising and unfair trade practices have become a veritable "growth industry" for enterprising plaintiff's lawyers. These cases often flow directly from government investigations and enforcement actions or private business litigation. For consumer product companies, understanding the current trends influencing consumer fraud litigation is crucial to managing this risk. Our two part webinar will discuss the key considerations and trends impacting consumer fraud litigation today, including government and Lanham Act litigation, recent legal decisions, as well as class action litigation and trial strategies. Topics included: - Current developments in class certification and lessons learned at trial S E L F - S T U D Y If you are viewing a recording of this web seminar, most state bar organizations will only allow you to claim self-study CLE credit. Please refer to your state's CLE rules. If you have any questions regarding CLE approval of this course in your applicable bar, please contact your bar administrator.
https://wn.com/Advertising_And_Consumer_Fraud_Litigation_Part_2_|_Intellectual_Property_|_United_States
US District Court of RI Litigation Academy HD

US District Court of RI Litigation Academy HD

  • Order:
  • Duration: 5:01
  • Updated: 02 Sep 2016
  • views: 463
videos
The “Litigation Academy” is a program of the United States District Court for the District of Rhode Island in partnership with Roger Williams University Law School and the Rhode Island Chapter of the Federal Bar Association that was created to provide a low-cost, high-quality forum for teaching practitioners of all experience levels the skills needed to successfully litigate cases. You are welcome to watch a short video of the program that was created by Carlos Andres Toro of Steer Digital Media.
https://wn.com/US_District_Court_Of_Ri_Litigation_Academy_Hd
Session 5: Domestic Litigation of International Norms (June 12, 2013)

Session 5: Domestic Litigation of International Norms (June 12, 2013)

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:36:45
  • Updated: 19 Jun 2013
  • views: 214
videos
International human rights norms can be, and have been, invoked in domestic litigation in a wide variety of contexts. State and federal courts in the United States have considered human rights claims - including those brought under the Alien Tort Statute - and the United States' international legal obligations on a range of issues. Panelists illustrated the ways in which international norms can be used to advance accountability for human rights abuses and strengthen arguments for protection or redress, but also identified the challenges and limitations of these strategies. Chimène Keitner, UC Hastings College of the Law Kathy Roberts, Center for Justice & Accountability Naomi Roht-Arriaza, UC Hastings College of the Law Karen Musalo, Center for Gender & Refugee Studies View or download the agenda, speaker bios, speaker presentations, and all the background informational materials here: bit.ly/humanrightsframework
https://wn.com/Session_5_Domestic_Litigation_Of_International_Norms_(June_12,_2013)
Federal Court Litigation

Federal Court Litigation

  • Order:
  • Duration: 6:03
  • Updated: 27 Jan 2012
  • views: 5
videos
http://www.leighlawgroup.com - federal court litigation,federal court attorney,federal court lawyer
https://wn.com/Federal_Court_Litigation
Global litigation school: Employment and labor risks in 2016 | Employment and labor | United States

Global litigation school: Employment and labor risks in 2016 | Employment and labor | United States

  • Order:
  • Duration: 56:47
  • Updated: 01 Mar 2016
  • views: 82
videos
Speakers: Shafeeqa Giarratani, Norton Rose Fulbright Andrew Price, Norton Rose Fulbright Blog: http://www.globalworkplaceinsider.com/ Presentation: http://www.nortonrosefulbright.com/fi... This web seminar covers the United States (US) and European Union (EU) employment and labor risks that are trending and how they may impact insureds and claims in this area. Topics will include: • Wage and hour class and collective actions – the cause and effect of the uptick in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and wage and hour class and collective actions, with a high concentration in the energy sector. • Sexual orientation – the rise in sexual orientation claims after the major Supreme Court Obergefell decision in 2015. • Whistleblowing – the potential impact of whistleblower claims. • Alternative working arrangements – this trend is increasing in popularity, as more companies offer flex programs and the option of working remotely. • Brexit risk – the likely impact for employment of the UK's exit from the EU if there is a "yes" vote in the UK referendum. • Gender pay equality – the changes to address the current gender pay gap being considered at the US and EU level and the mandatory gender pay gap reporting to be imposed on employers in the US and UK. • Collective employee consultation – the current trends in the UK including criminal prosecutions of offending company officers and the changes proposed at EU level. *If you are viewing a recording of this web seminar, most state bar organizations will only allow you to claim self-study CLE credit. Please refer to your state's CLE rules. If you have any questions regarding CLE approval of this course in your applicable bar, please contact your bar administrator.
https://wn.com/Global_Litigation_School_Employment_And_Labor_Risks_In_2016_|_Employment_And_Labor_|_United_States
Federal Tax Litigation, Choosing the Best Court to Make Your Appeal

Federal Tax Litigation, Choosing the Best Court to Make Your Appeal

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:46
  • Updated: 15 Sep 2017
  • views: 18
videos
As the principal attorney for the Law Offices of Christina Weed, PC, I have previously discussed how to initiate a tax court case in U.S. Tax Court if you have not received a desirable result during the course of your audit or with IRS Appeals. But, did you know that not all tax cases need to be brought in a U.S. Tax Court? Alternative options include filing a claim for refund in U.S. District Court and otherwise a case for refund could be brought in the U.S. Court of Federal claims. Each option has it's own distinctions and requirements, and it is important to meet with a tax lawyer who can advise you on which court may be best for your situation. Learn more here: https://cwlawoffices.com/federal-tax-litigation/
https://wn.com/Federal_Tax_Litigation,_Choosing_The_Best_Court_To_Make_Your_Appeal
Trademark Litigation Attorney 50 States-Vid58

Trademark Litigation Attorney 50 States-Vid58

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:45
  • Updated: 25 May 2011
  • views: 435
videos
Experienced trademark and unfair competition and intellectual property attorney in New York City (Carl Person) can assist lawyers anywhere in the United States in representing plaintiffs or defendants in Lanham Act or common law trademark litigation. Lanham Act infringement cases involve statutory damages which can be assessed against an infringing defendant, even though the trademark owner cannot show even one cent in damages by reason of the infringement, causing a substantial increase in trademark litigation to go after the million dollar bounty. Mr. Person provides high quality legal services at an affordable hourly rate, which can be an extension of another lawyer's office.
https://wn.com/Trademark_Litigation_Attorney_50_States_Vid58
United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

United States Body Shop Litigation (CNN Report)

  • Order:
  • Duration: 10:55
  • Updated: 17 Aug 2015
  • views: 29
videos https://wn.com/United_States_Body_Shop_Litigation_(Cnn_Report)
Attorneys in the United States  The Forum Litigation Attorney US Department of Justice on 1MDB

Attorneys in the United States The Forum Litigation Attorney US Department of Justice on 1MDB

  • Order:
  • Duration: 0:15
  • Updated: 25 Feb 2017
  • views: 0
videos
https://wn.com/Attorneys_In_The_United_States_The_Forum_Litigation_Attorney_US_Department_Of_Justice_On_1Mdb
Transnational Litigation in United States Courts Concepts and Insights

Transnational Litigation in United States Courts Concepts and Insights

  • Order:
  • Duration: 1:29
  • Updated: 08 Apr 2017
  • views: 0
videos
https://wn.com/Transnational_Litigation_In_United_States_Courts_Concepts_And_Insights
Frank Easterbrook, "The Supreme Court of the United States and Business Litigation"

Frank Easterbrook, "The Supreme Court of the United States and Business Litigation"

  • Order:
  • Duration: 45:57
  • Updated: 20 Feb 2015
  • views: 505
videos
https://wn.com/Frank_Easterbrook,_The_Supreme_Court_Of_The_United_States_And_Business_Litigation
International Civil Litigation in United States Courts by Gary B. Born

International Civil Litigation in United States Courts by Gary B. Born

  • Order:
  • Duration: 0:18
  • Updated: 13 Feb 2017
  • views: 0
videos
International Civil Litigation in United States Courts by Gary B. Born More Info : http://j.mp/2lFZhny
https://wn.com/International_Civil_Litigation_In_United_States_Courts_By_Gary_B._Born